The Role of Simplified Enterprise Architecture (Mini TOGAF) in Improving Project Management Governance and Decision-Making

Farhan Alif Budianto; Muharman  Lubis; Iqbal Yulizar  Mukti; Setyo Budianto

doi:10.59395/ijadis.v7i1.1493

Authors

Farhan Alif Budianto Telkom University, Indonesia
Muharman Lubis Telkom University, Indonesia
Iqbal Yulizar Mukti Telkom University, Indonesia
Setyo Budianto Telkom University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59395/ijadis.v7i1.1493

Keywords:

Enterprise Architecture, TOGAF 10, Simplification of artifacts, Design Science Research, PT Nuon Digital Indonesia

Abstract

The development of information technology in the digital age requires companies to have a system architecture that is aligned with their business strategy. One commonly used framework is The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF). However, the complexity of TOGAF is often an obstacle to its implementation, especially for organizations with limited resources. This study introduces a Mini TOGAF framework—an adaptive simplification of TOGAF 10 artifacts—designed specifically for digital creative enterprises. Unlike previous simplification models that mainly addressed SMEs in traditional industries, this framework integrates agile principles and stakeholder-centered validation cycles, reflecting the current evolution of enterprise architecture practice in 2023–2025. The method used is Design Science Research (DSR) with three main cycles: the Relevance Cycle to identify organizational needs, the Rigor Cycle to review relevant theories and methods, and the Design Cycle to iteratively design and evaluate artifacts. Data was collected through interviews, observations, and literature studies, then validated by the company. The results of the study show that the application of Mini TOGAF can improve architectural understanding, operational efficiency, business agility, and corporate strategy alignment. The simplification of TOGAF artifacts has been proven to reduce the complexity of implementation without reducing the main benefits of the framework. This study contributes to enterprise architecture literature by proposing an adaptive TOGAF 10 simplification model that strengthens the theoretical link between architectural governance and digital business agility. These findings provide practical contributions for organizations in adopting Enterprise Architecture efficiently and adaptively to modern business needs.

1462 1148

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] B. R. Putra and D. Santoso, 'The Role of IT in Enhancing Competitive Advantage in Companies', Journal of Information Technology and Management, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 27-39, 2020.

[2] L. K. Dewi, N. Handayani, and I. Subagyo, 'Strategic Information Systems Planning for Achieving Business Goals', Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 89-101, 2021.

[3] D. H. Olsen and K. Trelsgård, 'Enterprise Architecture adoption challenges: An exploratory case study of the Norwegian higher education sector', Procedia Comput Sci, vol. 100, pp. 804-811, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.228

[4] M. Lankhorst, Enterprise architecture at work: modelling, communication, and analysis. Springer, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53933-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53933-0

[5] T. O. Group, The TOGAF® Standard,10th edition. The Open Group, 2022.

[6] A. Ali and L. Miller, 'Aligning Business Strategy with IT Strategy: A Case Study of a Financial Institution', Journal of Information Systems, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 87-102, 2017.

[7] J. Smith, P. Brown, and R. Williams, 'Enterprise Architecture as a Maturity Model for Business-IT Alignment', Journal of Enterprise Information Management, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 654-669, 2019.

[8] P. Johnson, R. Lagerström, P. Närman, and M. Simonsson, 'Enterprise architecture analysis with extended influence diagrams', Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 163-180, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-007-9030-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-007-9030-y

[9] P. Gogulladass, 'Challenges faced by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in implementing and managing enterprise resource planning (ERP) projects', 2020.

[10] R. M. Foorthuis, F. Hofman, and T. Van Der Weide, 'The design and evaluation of a tool-supported method for business process architecture creation', Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 159-175, 2010.

[11] J. G. H. Smits and H. G. Sol, 'A Pragmatic Approach to Simplifying TOGAF for SMEs', Int J Inf Manage, 2014.

[12] Y. Gong and M. Janssen, 'The value of and myths about enterprise architecture', Int J Inf Manage, vol. 46, pp. 1-9, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.006

[13] M. Müller, M. Janssen, and F. Dinkelacker, 'Towards a comprehensive framework for enterprise architecture management tool support: An exploratory study', Information Systems Frontiers, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1297-1315, 2020.

[14] E. White and D. Green, 'Simplifying TOGAF for Better Business Outcomes', Journal of Enterprise Transformation, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 89-102, 2019.

[15] A. Widjajarto, M. Lubis, and U. Yunan, 'Architecture model of information technology infrastructure based on service quality at government institution', Procedia Comput Sci, vol. 161, pp. 841-850, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.191 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.191

[16] S. Gregor and A. R. Hevner, 'Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact', MIS quarterly, pp. 337-355, 2013. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.01

[17] A. E. Wibowo, Metodologi Penelitian Pegangan untuk Menulis Karya Ilmiah. Penerbit Insania, 2021.

[18] R. Wijaya and H. Setiawan, 'Implementation of TOGAF Framework to Enhance Cross-Functional Understanding in Enterprise Architecture', Journal of Information Systems and Technology Research, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 112-123, 2020.

[19] A. Rahman, L. P. Utami, and F. Hidayat, 'Simplified TOGAF Artifacts for Non-Technical Stakeholders: Improving Architectural Understanding', International Journal of Enterprise Architecture, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 45-57, 2021.

[20] H. Alghamdi, 'Assessing the impact of enterprise architecture on digital transformation success: A global perspective', Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 20, p. 8865, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208865 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16208865

[21] M. H. Sulaiman, 'Penerapan The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) - Simplified TOGAF untuk organisasi dengan keterbatasan sumber daya', Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel, 2019.

[22] Y. I. Alzoubi and A. Q. Gill, 'Can agile enterprise architecture be implemented successfully in distributed agile development? Empirical findings', Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 221-235, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-022-00298-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-022-00298-w

[23] F. Ramadhan, I. Hasby, N. Ramadhani, P. N. Rahmanda, and F. Fajrillah, 'PENERAPAN ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE UNTUK EFISIENSI DAN INTEGRASI OPERASIONAL PERUSAHAAN KAJIAN LITERATUR', Warta Dharmawangsa, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 660-672, 2025. https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v19i1.6043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v19i1.6043

[24] R. Van de Wetering, 'Dynamic enterprise architecture capabilities and organizational benefits: an empirical mediation study', arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.10036, 2021.