Web-Based E-Procurement Development in Regional-Owned Enterprises (BUMD): An R&D Approach

Authors

  • Nandang Sutisna School of Graduate Studies, Asia e University, Malaysia
  • Titik Khawa Abdul Rahman School of Graduate Studies, Asia e University, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59395/ijadis.v6i1.1374

Keywords:

e-procurement, Regional-Owned Enterprise, ISO/IEC 25010, Public Information System, Research and Development, An R&D Approach

Abstract

This study presents the design, development, and evaluation of a web-based e-procurement system tailored to the institutional needs of a Regional-Owned Enterprise (BUMD), with a case implementation at PDAM Tirta Kahuripan. Employing a Research and Development (R&D) methodology and assessed using ISO/IEC 25010 standards, the system integrates six core procurement modules—e-Planning, e-Budgeting, e-Preparation, e-Sourcing, e-Contracting, and e-Inventory—alongside a Vendor Management System (VMS) to enhance procurement transparency and supplier accountability. System testing involved both quantitative and qualitative assessments. Functionality and reliability achieved perfect scores (100%), usability scored 79 based on a System Usability Scale (SUS) survey completed by 20 procurement personnel, and maintainability recorded a moderate index of 82.85 based on PHP Metrics analysis. Efficiency testing using GTMetrix resulted in a Grade C, indicating areas for performance optimization. These findings demonstrate that the system is both technically robust and operationally relevant, offering a replicable model for digital procurement reform in decentralized public institutions. The study contributes to interdisciplinary knowledge across software engineering, public sector management, and procurement governance, with implications for future integration, scalability, and policy adoption in similar institutional contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1]. Adil, M., Nunes, M. B., & Peng, G. C. (2014). Identifying operational requirements to select suitable decision models for a public sector e-procurement decision support system. Jistem Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 11(2), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752014000200001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4301/s1807-17752014000200001

[2]. Adityo, B., Engkus, & Pikri, F. (2022). Komunikasi Pelayanan Publik Melalui Sistem Informasi Pelayanan Administrasi Dan Kependudukan Umum. Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 20(2), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.54783/DIALEKTIKA.V20I2.84 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54783/dialektika.v20i2.84

[3]. Bauhr, M., Czibik, Á., de Fine Licht, J., & Fazekas, M. (2020). Lights on the shadows of public procurement: Transparency as an antidote to corruption. Governance, 33(3), 495–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/GOVE.12432; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12432

[4]. Budiawan, W. (2024). Transparency in the Preparation of Terms of Reference in the Goods and Services Procurement System in BUMN. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 5(1), 436–444. https://doi.org/10.38035/JLPH.V5I1.787 DOI: https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i1.787

[5]. Ditari, Y., Kumaralalita, L., Hidayanto, A. N., Aminah, S., Phusavat, K., & Anussornnitisarn, P. (2018). E-procurement system success factors and their impact on transparency perceptions: perspectives from the supplier side. Electron. Gov. an Int. J., 14(1), 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2018.10009735 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2018.10009735

[6]. Egloffstein, M., & Ifenthaler, D. (2023). Modularizing MOOCs for Professional Learning: Prospects and Challenges for Instructional Design. 2023 IEEE Learning with MOOCS (LWMOOCS), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/LWMOOCS58322.2023.10305982 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/LWMOOCS58322.2023.10305982

[7]. Glavanits, J. (2019). The Future of Public Procurement: Innovation and Blockchain Technology. Hungarian Academy of Science.

[8]. Jonathan, K., Napitupulu, T. A., & Sari, R. (2017). IT good governance: A case of the role of e-Procurement in Indonesia. 2017 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech), 2018-January, 328–333. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTECH.2017. 8273560 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTech.2017.8273560

[9]. Khan, D. (2025). Revolutionizing Public Procurement In India: The Impact Of The Government E-Marketplace (GeM). International Journal of Innovations & Research Analysis, 05(01), 01–10. https://doi.org/10.62823/IJIRA/05.01.7145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62823/IJIRA/05.01.7145

[10]. Kurnia, M., & Rohman, A. (2023). Sistem Informasi RT (SIRT) Berbasis Web Dengan Menggunakan Metode Waterfall Sebagai Media Komunikasi Warga. Jurnal Mahasiswa Teknik Informatika, 2(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.35473/JAMASTIKA.V2I1.2146 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35473/jamastika.v2i1.2146

[11]. Mahuwi, L., & Israel, B. (2024). Promoting transparency and accountability towards anti-corruption in pharmaceutical procurement system: does e-procurement play a significant role? Management Matters, 21(1), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1108/MANM-07-2023-0027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MANM-07-2023-0027

[12]. Martin, A., Mardiyanto, M., & Widiyanto, W. (2025). PENGEMBANGAN SISTEM INFORMASI ADMINISTRASI DESA BERBASIS Web Di Desa Totokarto, Kabupaten Pringsewu. Journal of Software Engineering and Technology., 5(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.69769/SEAT.V5I1.230 DOI: https://doi.org/10.69769/seat.v5i1.230

[13]. Mu’ah, M., Masram, M., Amalia, W., Sayyid, M., & Mas’adah, M. (2024). Pengaruh Implementasi E-Procurement Terhadap Fraud Pengadaan Barang Dan Jasa Dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance. Owner, 8(2), 1810–1822. https://doi.org/10.33395/ owner.v8i2.2065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v8i2.2065

[14]. Neupane, A., Soar, J., & Vaidya, K. (2012). The potential of e-procurement technology for reducing corruption. International Journal of Information Technology and Management, 11(4), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJITM.2012.049997 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJITM.2012.049997

[15]. Nur, G., Jannah, M., & Widiyarta, A. (2023). Efektivitas Penggunaan E-Procurement Dari Sudut Pandang Penyedia Pada PT. Jatim Prasarana Utama. Journal Publicuho, 6(4), 1447–1455. https://doi.org/10.35817/PUBLICUHO.V6I4.290 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v6i4.290

[16]. Ngayu, D. M., & Juma, D. (2019). Determinants of E-Procurement Performance in County Governments. A Case Of Kajiado County, KENYA. Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.61426/SJBCM.V6I2.1135 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v6i2.1135

[17]. Peters, E., & Aggrey, G. K. (2020). An ISO 25010 based quality model for ERP systems. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems, 5(2), 578–583. https://doi.org/10.25046/AJ050272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25046/aj050272

[18]. Puspito, T. A. (2024). Evaluation of Website Performance and Usability Using GTMetrix, Usability Testing, and System Usability Scale (SUS) Methods. JURNAL TEKNIK INFORMATIKA, 17(2), 162–170. https://doi.org/10.15408/jti.v17i2.38530 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15408/jti.v17i2.38530

[19]. Sarwosri, S., Rochimah, S., Laili Yuhana, U., & Balqis Hidayat, S. (2023). Software Quality Measurement for Functional Suitability, Performance Efficiency, and Reliability Characteristics Using Analytical Hierarchy Process. JOIV : International Journal on Informatics Visualization, 7(4), 2421. https://doi.org/10.30630/joiv.7.4.02441 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30630/joiv.7.4.2441

[20]. Simalango, H. M., & Adrian, J. (2022). Evaluasi Kualitas Sistem Informasi Akademik Berdasarkan ISO/IEC 25010:2011 Pada Simak Universitas Universal. Biner : Jurnal Ilmiah Informatika Dan Komputer, 1(2), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.32699/BINER.V1I2.3110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32699/biner.v1i2.3110

[21]. Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan RD. Alfabeta.

[22]. Suparto, H. S., & Dai, R. H. (2021). Evaluasi Kualitas Sistem Informasi Pengukuran Prestasi Kerja Berdasarkan ISO/IEC 25010. Jambura Journal of Informatics, 3(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.37905/JJI.V3I2.11744 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37905/jji.v3i2.11744

[23]. Suria, O. (2024). A Statistical Analysis of System Usability Scale (SUS) Evaluations in Online Learning Platform. Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, 6(2), 992–1007. https://doi.org/10.51519/JOURNALISI.V6I2.750 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51519/journalisi.v6i2.750

[24]. Suwardi, M. P., & Prasetyo, P. E. (2018). Efisiensi Teknis Badan Usaha Milik Daerah (Bumd) Bidang Jasa Produksi Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan, 19(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.18196/JESP.19.1.4111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18196/jesp.19.1.4111

[25]. Torvinen, H., & Haukipuro, L. (2018). New roles for end-users in innovative public procurement: case study on user engaging property procurement. Public Management Review, 20(10), 1444–1464. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1400581 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1400581

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30

How to Cite

Web-Based E-Procurement Development in Regional-Owned Enterprises (BUMD): An R&D Approach (N. Sutisna & T. K. . Abdul Rahman, Trans.). (2025). International Journal of Advances in Data and Information Systems, 6(1), 135-151. https://doi.org/10.59395/ijadis.v6i1.1374

Share